Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective : To describe the state of the ractice of interventional radiology (IR) in sub-Saharan Africa French-speaking countries.


Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study conducted from 1 May to 31 August 2017. A self-administered questionnaire was addressed by email and by direct contact to radiologists practicing in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa. The socio-demographic profile of the respondents, the equipment available and the interventional radiology procedures practiced were filled in.


Results: The response rate was 27% for 92 radiologists. The average age of respondents was 36.93±6.16 years. There was a male predominance (sex ratio=2.14). Five radiologists (5%) had a university degree in IR and 46 (50%) had undergone continuing medical education in interventional radiology. The most available imaging modality was ultrasound (99%). Only 4% of the radiologists had an angiography room. Of the 67(73%) respondents performing IR procedures, 29(43%) of the procedures were diagnostic, 2(3%) therapeutic and 36(54%) both. The most common IR procedures were percutaneous sampling (67%) for diagnostic procedures, evacuation of collections and abscesses (41%) and osteoarticular therapeutic procedures (14%). All performed non-vascular procedures and only 09 (13%) performed vascular procedures.


Conclusion: Interventional radiology in sub-Saharan Africa french speaking countries remains embryonic. It is necessary to strengthen training policies and improve technical platforms.


RESUME


Objectif : Décrire l’état des lieux de la pratique de la radiologie interventionnelle (RI) en Afrique subsaharienne francophone.


Méthodes : Etude transversale descriptive menée du 1er mai au 31 août 2017. Un questionnaire auto-administré a été adressé par mail et par contact direct à des radiologues exerçant en Afrique subsaharienne francophone. Le profil sociodémographique des enquêtés, les équipements disponibles et les actes de radiologies interventionnels pratiqués ont été renseignés.


Résultats : Le taux de réponse était de 27% soit 92 radiologues. L’âge moyen des répondants était de 36,93±6,16 ans. Il y avait une prédominance masculine (sex-ratio=2,14). Cinq radiologues (5%) avaient un diplôme universitaire de RI et 46 (50%) avaient suivi une formation médicale continue en radiologie interventionnelle. Le moyen d’imagerie le plus disponible était l’échographie (99%). Seulement 4% des radiologues disposaient d’une salle d’angiographie. Sur 73% (67) des enquêtés réalisant des actes de RI, 43%(29) des actes étaient  à visée diagnostique, 3%(2) thérapeutiques et 54%(36) les deux. Les actes de RI les plus pratiqués étaient les prélèvements percutanés (67%) pour les actes à visée diagnostiques, des évacuations de collections et d’abcès (41%) et des gestes thérapeutiques ostéo articulaires (14%). Tous pratiquaient des actes non vasculaires et seulement 09 (13%) des actes vasculaires.


Conclusion : La RI en Afrique subsaharienne francophone reste embryonnaire. Un renforcement des politiques de formation et l’amélioration du plateau technique sont nécessaires.

Article Details

How to Cite
admin, admin, SAVI de TOVE Kofi-Mensa, AKANNI Djivèdé, ADJADOHOUN Sonia, KIKI Miralda, DONGMO TIOFACK Yannick, YEKPE-AHOUANSOU Patricia, BIAOU Olivier, & BOCO Vicentia. (2020). État des lieux de la pratique de la radiologie interventionnelle en Afrique subsaharienne francophone. Journal Africain d’Imagerie Médicale : Journal En Ligne Et En Version Papier - Printed and Online Open Journal, 12(2). Retrieved from http://jaim-online.net/index.php/jaim/article/view/100

References

  1. 1. Joffre F. Présentation de la radiologie interventionnelle en France en 2010. J Radiol. 2011;92(7–8):623–31.
  2. 2. Murphy TP, Soares GM. The evolution of interventional radiology. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2005;22(1):6–9.
  3. 3. Sunshine JH, Lewis RS BM. A Portrait of Interventional Radiologists in the United States. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(5):1103–12.
  4. 4. Teng GJ, Xu K, Ni CF, Li LS. Interventional radiology in China. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31(2):233–7.
  5. 5. Menechal P, Valero M, Megnigbeto C, Marchal C GJ. La radioprotection des patients et des travailleurs en radiologie interventionnelle et au bloc opératoire. Hygiène sécurité du traivail. 2011;222:27–33.
  6. 6. World Health Organization. Global atlas of medical devices. WHO Medical device technical series. 2017. 480 p.
  7. 7. Kawooya MG. Training for Rural Radiology and Imaging in Sub-Saharan Africa: Addressing the Mismatch Between Services and Population. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2012;2(2):37.
  8. 8. Mbewe C, Chanda-kapata P, Sunkutu-Sichizya V, Lambwe N, Yakovlyeva N, Chirwa M, et al. An audit of licenced Zambian diagnostic imaging equipment and personnel. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;8688.
  9. 9. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2020: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. World Health Organization; 2020. viii, 77 p.
  10. 10. Muhogora W, Rehani MM. Review of the current status of radiation protection in diagnostic radiology in Africa. J Med Imaging. 2017;4(3):031202.
  11. 11. Kline AD, Dixon RG, Brown MK, Culp MP. Interventional Radiology Readiness Assessment Tool for Global Health. J Glob Radiol. 2017;3(May):1–5.
  12. 12. Boudghene F. Radiologie interventionnelle en oncologie : état des lieux Interventional radiology in oncology : Inventory. J Radiol. 2011;91:753–6.
  13. 13. O’Brien J, Baerlocher MO, Asch MR, Hayeems E, Kachura JR, Collingwood P. Limitations Influencing Interventional Radiology in Canada : Results of a National Survey by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA). Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2007;30(5):847–53.
  14. 14. Zener R, Lee SY, Visscher KL, Ricketts M, Speer S, Wiseman D. Women in Radiology: Exploring the Gender Disparity. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(3):344-350.e1.
  15. 15. Wah TM, Belli AM. The Interventional Radiology (IR) Gender Gap: A Prospective Online Survey by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(8):1241–53.
  16. 16. Englander MJ, O’Horo SK. Women in interventional radiology: How are we doing? Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211(4):724–9.
  17. 17. Jaschke W, Bartal G, Trianni A, Belli AM. Fighting the Gender Gap in Interventional Radiology: Facts and Fiction Relating to Radiation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(8):1254–6.
  18. 18. Adigo A, Toure A, Djagnikikpo O, Adambounou K, Konenin N, Agoda-Koussema L, et al. Fréquence et sources de stress perçues par les médecins radiologues de l’Afrique noire francophone. J Afr Imag Med 2016;8(3):24–30.
  19. 19. Keeling AN, Reekers JA LM. The Clinical Practice of Interventional Radiology : A European Perspective. Cardiovasc Interv Radio. 2009;32:406–11.
  20. 20. Ogbole GI, Adeyomoye AO, Badu-Peprah A, Mensah Y, Nzeh DA. Survey of magnetic resonance imaging availability in West Africa. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;30.
  21. 21. Maboreke T, Banhwa J, Pitcher RD. An audit of licensed zimbabwean radiology equipment resources as measure of healthcare access and equity. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34.
  22. 22. Makary MS, Rajan A, Miller RJ, Elliott ED, Spain JW, Guy GE. Institutional Interventional Radiology Symposium Increases Medical Student Interest and Identifies Target Recruitment Candidates. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018;48(4):363–7.
  23. 23. Tan Z-B, Wang H-J, Zou R, Mao X-Q, Zhang J, Wang Q-Q, et al. Curriculum of Interventional Radiology for Clinical Medical Undergraduates. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130(19):2380–1.
  24. 24. Mollura DJ, Soroosh G, Culp MP, Averill S, Axelrod D, Baheti A, et al. 2016 RAD-AID Conference on International Radiology for Developing Countries: Gaps, Growth, and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(6):841–7.
  25. 25. Laage Gaupp FM, Solomon N, Rukundo I, Naif AA, Mbuguje EM, Gonchigar A, et al. Tanzania IR Initiative: Training the First Generation of Interventional Radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(12):2036–40.
  26. 26. European Society of Radiology (ESR); Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). Interventional radiology in European radiology departments : a joint survey from the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). Insights Imaging. 2019;10(16):1–9.